
Architecture students and alumni of Hong Kong’s top university have criticised its plan to revamp a historic gate by adding two escalators to improve accessibility, questioning the redesign’s effectiveness and the institution’s decision-making procedures.
The row involving the University of Hong Kong (HKU) escalated as 280 people, including architecture students and alumni, signed a petition against the revamp of the east gate which they regarded as holding “a special place in people’s collective memory”.
Speaking to the Post on Friday, HKU alumnus Alfred Ho Shahng-herng, founder and director of the Urban Studies Institute, also criticised the university for not carrying out consultations with students and staff or seeking advice from architecture and engineering faculties.
“This is a ‘missed opportunity’ for the university to improve the image and design of the east gate,” Ho said.
The planned redesign of the east gate features two new escalators.
Students and alumni have signed a petition to halt construction.
“The East Gate holds a special place in people’s collective memory. It serves as not only a spatial connection between the university and the local communities but also a temporal connection between generations of students.”
Responding to inquires from the Post, a HKU spokesman said on Friday that the project was one of the university’s ongoing campus development and facility upgrade initiatives.
He said its design and details had taken into account the site’s existing condition and geotechnical constraints, and had been deliberated in a university committee responsible for facilities development and comprising different stakeholders.
The new entrance would retain elements of the current plaque on the main archway, he added.
Dr Lee Ho-yin, a retired associate professor of HKU’s faculty of architecture, said the university had been working on the renovation of the east gate for years, and had made the information public among students and staff with consultations having been carried out previously.
He suspected that some new students did not know the renovation’s history, leading to the argument.
As a previous member of a university committee which was made up of representatives from different faculties to oversee the renovation work, Lee said the revamp was intended to boost the identity of the institution, make the entrance greener and enhance its functionality by adding two escalators.
He said, based on the photo from the university’s email, the new design met the criteria.
Lee noted the university did not conduct consultations for every project, which could be time-consuming and costly, but added that making information public and transparent was necessary, especially for large-scale projects.