Hong Kong News

Nonpartisan, Noncommercial, unconstrained.
Thursday, Mar 28, 2024

Former Israeli Defense Minister explains the reason, in his view, that justifies killing innocent civilians in Gaza

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not between good people and bad people, but between two groups of people whose bad luck has pushed them into a situation where both sides seem to have no choice but to choose between killing or being killed. Despair, rage, revenge and a one-sided sense of justice prevent both sides from choosing the natural option of living and letting live.

“Bella Hadid, Trevor Noah & John Oliver: What would you do if endless missile attacks on your civilians were conducted from a hospital, school and office building where there are also media offices?” Israel’s former Defense Minister Naftali Bennett responds to growing criticism around the world against the use of Israel's military force against targets that result in the mass killing of innocent civilians 

No one can challenge the facts that Mr. Naftali Bennett highlights from one side and Bella Hadid, Trevor Noah & John Oliver highlight from the other. 


And this is where the problem known as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict begins and ends: everyone is factually correct, in a one-sided description, of this two-sided problem.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not between good people and bad people, but between two groups of people whose bad luck has pushed them into a situation where both sides seem to have no choice but to choose between killing or being killed.

Despair, rage, revenge and a one-sided sense of justice prevent both sides from choosing the natural option of living and letting live.

The interests of too many powerful foreign states wanting to control the region through a divide-and-conquer strategy are not helping either of the local peoples to choose peace as a viable option.

The majority of the general public on both sides are only interested in living their own lives in peace, rather than continuing to raise children just to be killed or to kill others.

But the public - on both sides - are trapped in a cynical political game, where the rules of the game are quite clear: peace is a boring election issue that cannot get an indifferent public out of the house to vote. Whereas hatred, war and paranoia trigger the exciting adrenaline rush that galvanizes the extreme voters, driving them to the voting booths, and delivering election victory.

C'est la vie. This is democracy. And here we are.

According to Mr. Bennett, Israel has only two options: to avoid massive military action and die, or to act militarily with all its superpower, even at the cost of inevitable murder of many innocent civilians, and destroying essential civilian infrastructure such as hospitals, schools and international media outlets.

For some unfathomable reason, the former defense minister of a country that claims to have the best intelligence in the world does not mention that there is a third possibility, that has been tested and successfully executed hundreds, if not thousands of times in the past, which is to act against military targets and terrorists only, not by attacking with massive bombardment from the air, but by precision-point commando operations, as well as by local gangs and cooperators.

However, there is no dispute that it is not just the right but the duty of the Israeli government to do everything it can to protect its innocent civilians from Hamas' murderous missile attacks. But it is highly disputable that the indiscriminate killing and collective punishment of masses of innocent civilians is what the State of Israel should choose as the final solution to what it and it’s supporters see as terrorism, and what Palestine and its supporters see as a war for independence.

There are not “only” humanitarian but also historical reasons that require the State of Israel to refrain from collective punishment that causes the deaths of many innocent civilians, including children, women, and the elderly.

There is also strategic reason why Israel should stop any attack on civilians - regardless of how high profile is a terrorist that is hiding among them and using them as a human shield.

Expanding the circle of innocent victims does not combat terrorism, but simply increases the number of those who have no other way but terrorism to avenge the murder of their family members.

In other words, the State of Israel must not increase the motivation of a weakened population to join the cycle of revenge by means of terrorism, but rather nullify their motives and prevent their justification for choosing terrorism as their only means to achieve justice.

The millions of Palestinians living in the so-called autonomous zone are already seriously afflicted and destabilized by their limited civil rights. An effective war on terrorism needs to provide them with hope instead of despair, and with fairness instead of giving them justifiable reasons for taking revenge.

The confrontation between the Jews and the Palestinians is not a confrontation between good and evil. It is a conflict between two peoples, who are descendants of the same father, who believe in the same God, and who are fated to live together in a small country with many places that are holy for all of them. Shouldn’t there be a better alternative than terror to get justice (and contrary to the common fantasy, a peace brought about by force is not a substitute for justice, obviously).



Do both sides really believe in God?

Those with a true and sincere faith in God - actually the same God for all - must not try to deny the fact that the two descendants of Abraham are brothers, and that neither of the two religions (or in fact none of the three) have any sort of ownership on God.

Attempting to take ownership of God instead of allowing each person to honor and work for God in his own way, is an act of heresy contrary to the most fundamental principles of all religions.

All should accept the simple fact that God is the owner of all peoples alike, regardless of their prophets.

Furthermore, it is an abuse of the name of God to attempt to take ownership of materialistic assets that are holy to all of God's peoples.

It is contrary to religion to fight for control of God's places instead of worshipping the very same God together, in any holy place, each in his own way, each through his own prophets, way and flavor. It is contrary to religion to oppose God's work by being exclusive to one people instead of encouraging all people to honor the same God.

Assuming that genocide is not a legitimate option for either side of this conflict, the only alternative is a fair compromise based on mutual respect and a complete and equal freedom for each side. This outcome would recognize and reconcile with reality as it is, instead of denying it and embarking on a joint suicide mission for the sake of trying to turn history back 70 years, or even 3000 years.

Both sides must maximize the enormous potential of living in peace instead of remaining enslaved to the tragedies of a history that in any case cannot be reversed. No act of revenge is capable of making the future of any nation better or less tragic.

There is no God but the one and the only God who commands all people - Jews, Muslims and Christians - to live and let others live. He who claims otherwise is not the representative of God.

It is time for the 99% in both sides of the conflict to ignore the 1% who are profiting from the bloodshed, put the past behind them and to move forward.

Not because the land does not belong to the other side, but because both sides have no other land to live in.



 


Comments

Alfred 3 year ago
Imagine the controversy if a leading/former politician were to
try and justify the killing of Jewish civilians.
Hitchcock 3 year ago
Alfred:
“Those responsible for the occupying Palestine” (That was United nation in 1948, remember?) “and their supporters” (33 states voted for, only 13 against it) “will have to bear the burden of History recording their being responsible for the Palestinian Holocaust” (here is your big mistake. The only reason that there is currently a conflict, is that the Jews did not “commit Holocaust” to the Palestinians, as USA, Canada, Australia and New Zeland did to their natives. This is a tragic situation of two nations that has left with no other choice but to do bad things to each other. it is wrong, and many things could and should be done totally different, but Holocaust Is not and even not 1% of it is not. Israel is handling this crisis wrong, and Hamas helping them to handle it even worse. The solution is not to blame, but to contain. On both sides.
Alfred 3 year ago
"Descendants of the same father" seems therefore they are both Semites, Wait that wont work as it would destroy the anti-Semite propaganda.
Alfred 3 year ago
Hitchcock ;
Those responsible for the occupying Palestine and their supporters will have to bear the burden of History recording their being responsible for the Palestinian Holocaust.
Hitchcock 3 year ago
No Alfred. You are wrong. We can argue if what Mr. Benet said is right or wrong, but it is absolutely wrong to use disagreement with whatever he said to justify or even just tolerate anti-semitism.

Mr. Benet is not speaking in the name of the Jews or Judaism. He is a representative of the Israel Government. Or in fact -as of today- he is part of the minority of the Israeli... opposition.

Many Jewish people, inside Israel and around the world, opposed loud and clear the operation in Gaza. So the dispute is not with or against “Jews”, therefore nothing in it to justify antisemitism.

Some Jewish, as well as Christians and Muslims by the way, think that Israel has the right to defend themselves aggressively, and some not.

It has nothing to do with semitism or antisemitism. Many Christians supports the Israeli operations in Gaza. And that doesn’t justify anti Christianity too.

So it’s not a “Jewish” issue. It’s an “Israeli” issue. Do not mix the two, nor generalize blame.

Israel is not “The” Jewish state (America has more Jewish than Israel, and millions are in Europe, Canada and Australia).

It’s a democratic-Jewish state where, believe it or not, an Islamic party got more votes in the last election than Mr. Benet. So like it or not, the voters who will decide who will be the Israel’s next prime minister it’s the Israeli-Muslim voters, not Mr. Benet who is supported by only 300,000 voters (3.5% of all Israeli citizens and 1.5% of all the Jews in the world).

Not everything that a Jew is doing right or wrong it’s a Jewish problem or Nobel. Just as not everything that a Christian or a Muslim does represent all of them or the majority of them.

Personally I think that Mr. Benet is wrong. It’s wrong to bomb terrorist among civilians. But this is my opinion in my comfort luxury and safe zone. If they would even think to shoot at my home or harm my children’s, my opinion will be that Mr. Benet is too soft and the Israeli reaction is too gentle. c'est la vie, as I wrote in the article...
Alfred 3 year ago
What a horrible thing to say, no wonder the rise in ant-Semitism is reaching unprecedented heights.

Newsletter

Related Articles

Hong Kong News
0:00
0:00
Close
It's always the people with the dirty hands pointing their fingers
Paper straws found to contain long-lasting and potentially toxic chemicals - study
FTX's Bankman-Fried headed for jail after judge revokes bail
Blackrock gets half a trillion dollar deal to rebuild Ukraine
Steve Jobs' Son Launches Venture Capital Firm With $200 Million For Cancer Treatments
Google reshuffles Assistant unit, lays off some staffers, to 'supercharge' products with A.I.
End of Viagra? FDA approved a gel against erectile dysfunction
UK sanctions Russians judges over dual British national Kara-Murza's trial
US restricts visa-free travel for Hungarian passport holders because of security concerns
America's First New Nuclear Reactor in Nearly Seven Years Begins Operations
Southeast Asia moves closer to economic unity with new regional payments system
Political leader from South Africa, Julius Malema, led violent racist chants at a massive rally on Saturday
Today Hunter Biden’s best friend and business associate, Devon Archer, testified that Joe Biden met in Georgetown with Russian Moscow Mayor's Wife Yelena Baturina who later paid Hunter Biden $3.5 million in so called “consulting fees”
'I am not your servant': IndiGo crew member, passenger get into row over airline meal
Singapore Carries Out First Execution of a Woman in Two Decades Amid Capital Punishment Debate
Spanish Citizenship Granted to Iranian chess player who removed hijab
US Senate Republican Mitch McConnell freezes up, leaves press conference
Speaker McCarthy says the United States House of Representatives is getting ready to impeach Joe Biden.
San Francisco car crash
This camera man is a genius
3D ad in front of Burj Khalifa
Next level gaming
BMW driver…
Google testing journalism AI. We are doing it already 2 years, and without Google biased propoganda and manipulated censorship
Unlike illegal imigrants coming by boats - US Citizens Will Need Visa To Travel To Europe in 2024
Musk announces Twitter name and logo change to X.com
The politician and the journalist lost control and started fighting on live broadcast.
The future of sports
Unveiling the Black Hole: The Mysterious Fate of EU's Aid to Ukraine
Farewell to a Music Titan: Tony Bennett, Renowned Jazz and Pop Vocalist, Passes Away at 96
Alarming Behavior Among Florida's Sharks Raises Concerns Over Possible Cocaine Exposure
Transgender Exclusion in Miss Italy Stirs Controversy Amidst Changing Global Beauty Pageant Landscape
Joe Biden admitted, in his own words, that he delivered what he promised in exchange for the $10 million bribe he received from the Ukraine Oil Company.
TikTok Takes On Spotify And Apple, Launches Own Music Service
Global Trend: Using Anti-Fake News Laws as Censorship Tools - A Deep Dive into Tunisia's Scenario
Arresting Putin During South African Visit Would Equate to War Declaration, Asserts President Ramaphosa
Hacktivist Collective Anonymous Launches 'Project Disclosure' to Unearth Information on UFOs and ETIs
Typo sends millions of US military emails to Russian ally Mali
Server Arrested For Theft After Refusing To Pay A Table's $100 Restaurant Bill When They Dined & Dashed
The Changing Face of Europe: How Mass Migration is Reshaping the Political Landscape
China Urges EU to Clarify Strategic Partnership Amid Trade Tensions
The Last Pour: Anchor Brewing, America's Pioneer Craft Brewer, Closes After 127 Years
Democracy not: EU's Digital Commissioner Considers Shutting Down Social Media Platforms Amid Social Unrest
Sarah Silverman and Renowned Authors Lodge Copyright Infringement Case Against OpenAI and Meta
Why Do Tech Executives Support Kennedy Jr.?
The New York Times Announces Closure of its Sports Section in Favor of The Athletic
BBC Anchor Huw Edwards Hospitalized Amid Child Sex Abuse Allegations, Family Confirms
Florida Attorney General requests Meta CEO's testimony on company's platforms' alleged facilitation of illicit activities
The Distorted Mirror of actual approval ratings: Examining the True Threat to Democracy Beyond the Persona of Putin
40,000 child slaves in Congo are forced to work in cobalt mines so we can drive electric cars.
×