The Hong Kong Bar Association will lead a 20-member delegation to the country’s capital in April in a significant thawing of relations after such exchanges were frozen five years ago and amid assurances from Beijing that the city’s common law system will remain unchanged.

In an exclusive interview with the Post on Wednesday, association chairman Victor Dawes, SC, also revealed that Xia Baolong, director of the State Council’s Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office (HKMAO), had sent out a reassuring message in a private meeting with him that the city’s independent bar would remain a vital part of the common law system which in itself was critical to Hong Kong.

The message was a strong reassurance to the younger generation of barristers, he said, as he disclosed how Xia had invited him to Shenzhen in February before China’s legislature met for its annual gathering earlier this month, and they had discussed a range of legal issues facing Hong Kong.

Xia Baolong, director of the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office.

“At the meeting with Xia, I raised the concern of some young barristers that there is no independent barristers profession in mainland China and whether the independent bar in Hong Kong will disappear in the future,” Dawes said.

“I was then assured by him that he saw the independent bar as part of the common law system in Hong Kong and there is no reason to change our system.”

Ahead of the ice-breaking visit to Beijing, he revealed the association had also started to resume regular activities with the mainland with some members recommencing in-person teaching classes about the common law system in Peking University this month.

Describing the visit as “meeting old friends and making new friends”, Dawes said he was informed by Beijing authorities some time ago that the association could make the 20-member delegation visit from April 11 to 15 to Beijing.

On the agenda would be visits to the HKMAO, legal institutions including the Legislative Affairs Commission of the National People’s Congress, Beijing’s courts including the Supreme People’s Court, and universities in the capital. The visit will also include exchanges with legal peers on the mainland.

This will mark the association’s first invitation to the capital since 2018 after tensions between previous office holders and Beijing, as well as the Covid-19 pandemic, put the ties on ice.

“The annual visit to Beijing by the Bar Association had been going on for many years. It had been stopped for a few years, partly because of Covid and also partly because of other reasons. So we’re encouraged that we can resume the annual visit,” he said.

Victor Dawes.

Founded in 1949, the Bar Association was on good terms with Beijing for years following the city’s return to Chinese rule in 1997. It had a tradition of sending delegates to the capital every year to meet officials and hold lectures on common law at mainland Chinese universities.

Relations soured after prominent human rights lawyer Philip Dykes took the helm in 2018 followed by Paul Harris in 2021 and Beijing ended all exchanges with the body.

The two were vocal in raising concerns over developments they felt to be detrimental to the city’s rule of law. Both also criticised the imposition of the national security law, objections viewed by Beijing as a deliberate distortion of its determination to restore law and order to the city and protect national sovereignty, all vital to the continuance of the rule of law.

In his interview with the Post, Dawes said the association’s delegation would relay the members’ views to Beijing authorities about an array of issues, including the national security law, the coming Article 23 legislation and risks of Western sanctions as part of the challenges facing the legal profession.

“I’m sure we’ll touch upon a wide range of subjects that Hong Kong people are concerned about and we will do our very best in relaying an accurate and comprehensive view to the central authorities … I am consulting my members as to the sort of messages they want us to bring with us.”

Dawes pledged there would be frank dialogues between the association and mainland authorities to seek mutual understanding, stressing that the trip was not for the purpose of exchanging favours with Beijing.

“If you asked me whether I want something concrete, I can only say that it is the opportunity to convey the views of the legal professionals of the bar, and also the views of Hong Kong people,” he said.

“I’m sure the central government would not want the bar to just sugarcoat anything or report positive developments.”

On his meeting with Xia, Dawes said the HKMAO chief also emphasised the importance of maintaining “one country, two systems” alongside the preservation of the common law system in Hong Kong, as he asked him to send out the message across the profession, especially to young barristers.

“I think this is very encouraging. It shows that the central government actually is keen on preserving the common law system in Hong Kong,” he said.

Beijing’s emphasis on the need to uphold the common law system in recent months was seen by analysts as recognition of Hong Kong’s importance as a connector between the mainland and the world for business and other commercial interactions.

President Xi Jinping during his visit to Hong Kong last July.

During a visit to Hong Kong in July last year to mark the city’s 25th handover anniversary, Chinese President Xi Jinping emphasised the need to maintain the city’s unique status and strengths for the long term, including retaining its common law system and consolidating its role as an international financial hub in an open economy linked to the world.

On business opportunities that could be gained from the resumption of ties with mainland authorities, Dawes pointed to the rising demand for common law expertise in building up a regional dispute resolution hub for the city, something which the authorities had been working hard on and was part of the country’s 14th five-year development plan.

“Mainland and overseas clients trust the city’s common law system … Using common law for dispute resolution is something very popular. It is also the policy of the central government to promote Hong Kong as a regional dispute resolution hub,” he said.

“So, I think Hong Kong practitioners actually have a vital role to play not only for Hong Kong, but also in promoting common law in exchange and in passing on our knowledge in helping [mainlanders] studying to be lawyers.”